Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41632953›Full record

ArticleJMIR AI2026

Message Humanness as a Predictor of AI's Perception as Human: Secondary Data Analysis of the HeartBot Study.

Haruno Suzuki, Jingwen Zhang, Diane Dagyong Kim, Kenji Sagae, Holli A DeVon, Yoshimi Fukuoka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haruno SuzukiDepartment of Physiological Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7401-5721
Jingwen ZhangDepartment of Communication, University of California, Davis, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1733-6857
Diane Dagyong KimDepartment of Communication, University of California, Davis, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7174-9684
Kenji SagaeDepartment of Linguistics, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3371-0618
Holli A DeVonSchool of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4526-9631
Yoshimi FukuokaDepartment of Physiological Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2245-9264

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) chatbots have become prominent tools in health care to enhance health knowledge and promote healthy behaviors across diverse populations. However, factors influencing the perception of AI chatbots and human-AI interaction are largely unknown.

objectiveThis study aimed to identify interaction characteristics associated with the perception of an AI chatbot identity as a human versus an artificial agent, adjusting for sociodemographic status and previous chatbot use in a diverse sample of women.

methodsThis study was a secondary analysis of data from the HeartBot trial in women aged 25 years or older who were recruited through social media from October 2023 to January 2024. The original goal of the HeartBot trial was to evaluate the change in awareness and knowledge of heart attack after interacting with a fully automated AI HeartBot chatbot. All participants interacted with HeartBot once. At the beginning of the conversation, the chatbot introduced itself as HeartBot. However, it did not explicitly indicate that participants would be interacting with an AI system. The perceived chatbot identity (human vs artificial agent), conversation length with HeartBot, message humanness, message effectiveness, and attitude toward AI were measured at the postchatbot survey. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to explore factors predicting women's perception of a chatbot's identity as a human, adjusting for age, race or ethnicity, education, previous AI chatbot use, message humanness, message effectiveness, and attitude toward AI.

resultsAmong 92 women (mean age 45.9, SD 11.9; range 26-70 y), the chatbot identity was correctly identified by two-thirds (n=61, 66%) of the sample, while one-third (n=31, 34%) misidentified the chatbot as a human. Over half (n=53, 58%) had previous AI chatbot experience. On average, participants interacted with the HeartBot for 13.0 (SD 7.8) minutes and entered 82.5 (SD 61.9) words. In multivariable analysis, only message humanness was significantly associated with the perception of chatbot identity as a human compared with an artificial agent (adjusted odds ratio 2.37, 95% CI 1.26-4.48; P=.007).

conclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to explicitly ask participants whether they perceive an interaction as human or from a chatbot (HeartBot) in the health care field. This study's findings (role and importance of message humanness) provide new insights into designing chatbots. However, the current evidence remains preliminary. Future research is warranted to understand the relationship between chatbot identity, message humanness, and health outcomes in a larger-scale study.

Indexed as

ageAIanthropomorphismartificial intelligencechatbot identitychatbotsconversationseducationeffectivenessethnicityhealthcarehealth outcomeshuman-AI interactionhumannessinteractionlogistic regressionmessagesperceptionspredictionpredictivesecondary analysissurveyswomen

Identifiers

PMID41632953
PMCPMC12914229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.