ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2026
Outcomes of Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures by Fixation Construct: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPeriprosthetic distal femur fractures (PDFFs) are increasing with rising arthroplasty volumes. An optimal fixation strategy remains debated. This study evaluated outcomes of single lateral locking plate constructs (sLLPs), retrograde intramedullary nails (IMNs), and dual constructs (nail-plate or dual plating).
methodsA retrospective cohort study was done at a level I trauma center (2012 to 2024). Adults with PDFF (AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association 33) treated with sLLP, IMN, or dual constructs were included. All patients were assessed for postoperative weight-bearing status, while clinical outcomes required ≥6-month follow-up or earlier documented complications. Outcomes included revision surgery, infection, implant failure, hardware removal, wound dehiscence, and time to weight bearing as tolerated (WBAT).
resultsOf 99 identified patients, 64 met criteria (IMN: n = 20; sLLP: n = 19; dual: n = 25). Mean age was 69.0 years; 75.0% female, 59.4% Black; mean follow-up 391.5 days. Immediate WBAT was ore common in dual (70.7%) and IMN (52.8%) groups than sLLP (9.1%; P < 0.001). Mean time to WBAT was shortest with dual constructs (13.8 days), followed by IMN (26.0) and sLLP (42.8; P = 0.020). On multivariable analysis, sLLP fixation was associated with increased odds of unplanned revision surgery (OR 6.27, 95% confidence interval, 1.29 to 30.50, P = 0.023), while neither IMN (P = 0.157) nor dual constructs (P = 0.071) demonstrated a significant association.
conclusionSingle lateral locking plate fixation in PDFF was associated with higher odds of unplanned revision surgery. Dual construct patients had the shortest time to postoperative weight bearing and were more frequently permitted WBAT immediately after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.