Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41632923›Full record

ArticleNursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals2026

Cultivating a 'Habitus of Multiplicity' in Cross-Cultural Medicine: From Case Study Conflict to Many-Sided Conditions of Care Through Process and Jain Metaphysics.

Brianne Donaldson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Brianne DonaldsonShri Parshvanath Presidential Chair in Jain Studies, University of California, Irvine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4597-7231

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prompted by a nursing case study that occurred in 2022, this paper joins the perspectives of a nurse practitioner and cross-cultural medical ethics professor to consider who can ask a question in the healthcare system, what questions can be heard, and how to develop pluralistic care models-beyond relativism and imperialism-that solicit more diverse experiences and inquiries. Specifically, I utilise the metaphysical concepts of Alfred North Whitehead's 'actual occasion' alongside the 'many-sided-view' (anekānta-vāda) from the Jain tradition of South Asia to theorise a processual 'habitus of multiplicity' by which healthcare professionals, especially nurses, engage with and as a many-faceted event. As event, cultivating this 'habitus of multiplicity' is akin to a perceptive mode that: (1) anticipates the complex 'who' of each individual patient and provider as creative powers-in-process, (2) solicits novel inquiries between patients, providers, and health systems, including those previously 'unheard of' in dominant frameworks, and (3) promotes procedural efforts to mutually pluralise, rather than relativise, non-hierarchical care models.

Indexed as

Culturally Competent CareMetaphysicsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41632923
PMCPMC12867508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.