Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41632811›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Remote electrophysiological cardiotocography (eCTG), evaluation of feasibility in complicated pregnancies from 32 until 37 weeks gestational age in a home@hospital setting (HASTA): A prospective cohort study protocol.

Sofie van Weelden, Loes Monen, M Beatrijs van der Hout-van der Jagt, Judith O E H van Laar

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06859177 (Remote Electrophysiological Cardiotocography), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06859177 narecruitingnot on this map

Remote Electrophysiological Cardiotocography (eCTG), Evaluation of Feasibility in (a Selected Group of) Complicated Pregnancies From 32 Until 37 Weeks Gestational Age in a Home@Hospital Setting: a Prospective Cohort Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMaxima Medical CenterRan2025 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsPregnancy Related, Remote Monitoring, FeasibilityArmsRemote eCTG
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Urolithiasis in patients with cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sofie van WeeldenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Máxima MC, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6580-5875
Loes MonenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Máxima MC, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
M Beatrijs van der Hout-van der JagtDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Máxima MC, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Judith O E H van LaarDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Máxima MC, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHigh-risk pregnancies, including those complicated by pre-eclampsia, fetal growth restriction or preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes, often require hospitalization for fetal and maternal monitoring. Home monitoring may reduce the psychological and family burden, improve patient satisfaction, and lower health care costs. The primary diagnostic tool for fetal home monitoring is cardiotocography (CTG). However, conventional CTG can suffer from poor signal quality due to maternal obesity or movements. Since electrophysiological cardiotocography (eCTG) relies on electrical activity in cardiac and uterine muscles, signal quality is less impacted by obesity and motion artefacts than with conventional CTG, making eCTG also interesting for home monitoring. As remote eCTG is self-administered, it eliminates the need for professional support at home, potentially increasing autonomy and satisfaction. Nevertheless, signal quality of self-administered eCTG in the preterm period is unknown. This prospective cohort study will assess the feasibility of self-administered eCTG, using NemoRemote in a hospital setting between 32-37 weeks of gestation, simulating home use.

methodsIn this single center prospective cohort study, 60 pregnant patients (≥18 years) with a singleton high-risk pregnancy from 32 until 37 weeks of gestational age will be recruited. Remote self-administered eCTG will be performed either daily for patients admitted to the hospital, or at least twice a week at the outpatient clinic. The primary outcome is the proportion of successful eCTG recordings. Secondary outcomes include maternal and perinatal outcomes, patient and healthcare professional satisfaction, and a cost analysis.

conclusionThis study will provide valuable insights into the technical and logistical feasibility of self-administered eCTG monitoring in high-risk pregnancies, with potential implications for the implementation of remote fetal monitoring. A hospital-based feasibility study was chosen over an implementation study to safely assess signal quality of remote eCTG before broader application.

trial registrationThis trial is registered on the Dutch trial register "Onderzoeksportaal" (NO. NL-OMON57084) https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/57084. Date registered: 05/11/2024 and the international trial register "ClinicalTrials.gov" (NO. NCT06859177); http://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06859177. Date registered: 05/03/2025.

Indexed as

CardiotocographyPregnancy ComplicationsAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesRemote Patient Monitoring

Identifiers

PMID41632811
PMCPMC12867231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.