ArticlePloS one2026
Differences in the fitness effects of traded resources shape traits and persistence in multi-mutualist communities.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mutualistic interactions, where species reciprocally benefit from each other, are crucial for ecosystem stability and biodiversity. These interactions often involve species that experience different fitness effects for the traded resources or services. Because mutualisms rely on positive feedback between partners, such asymmetries can strongly influence evolutionary outcomes. Differences in fitness effects create divergent selective pressures, shaping trait evolution and determining the persistence of mutualisms. The strength of these effects can also vary depending on the availability of traded resources from other sources. Despite their importance, the evolutionary role of fitness asymmetries in mutualism has received little attention, beyond recognizing that some species may be more dependent on their partners than others. This study investigates how asymmetry in the fitness effects of a traded resource influences the persistence and phenotypic trait evolution of species in multi-mutualist guilds. To test this, we constructed synthetic multi-mutualist communities by combining, reproductively isolated and genetically modified strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that engage in a nutritional mutualism by trading adenine and lysine. One guild of four strains cannot produce lysine but overproduces adenine while the other guild cannot produce adenine but overproduces lysine. Lysine overproducers survive periods of low adenine better than adenine overproducers survive low lysine. Over a four-week evolution experiment we observed that strain persistence was strongly influenced by the availability of external resources. Communities in media containing traded resources supported the survival of all strains, whereas obligate conditions led to a significant extinction, especially for adenine overproducers. We observed distinct evolutionary trajectories of traits under obligate versus supplemented conditions. Phenotypic assays revealed that costs and benefits evolved differently depending on the essentiality of the traded resource and nutrient supplementation. These results demonstrate that asymmetries in the fitness effects of traded resources can influence evolutionary outcomes, species persistence, and community stability in multi-mutualist communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.