ArticlePloS one2026
Novel height estimation formula that accounts for the effects of aging based on lumbar length measurements in postmortem CT images.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In forensic practice, personal identification using expert testimony is important in unidentified cases, and the height of the deceased is indispensable in identification. Although many height estimation formulas have been reported, height estimates are often too great in the elderly due to age-related shortening. In this study, we address this problem by developing a height estimation formula based on measurement of the lumbar spine, which is thought to shorten with age. To develop a height estimation equation based on lumbar spine length, 183 postmortem CT images taken at our institute from 2016 to 2023 (ages 19-95 years) were prepared for the training dataset and 78 images were used for the validation dataset. In all training dataset cases, anterior margin height (ALV), central height (CLV), and posterior margin height (PLV) of each lumber vertebra and total lumber spine length including the intervertebral disc (LVTL) were measured on 3D CT-reconstructed images. The sum of the ALV (SALV), CLV (SCLV), and PLV (SPLV) of all lumbar vertebrae were calculated by image analysis software, and the correlation between each index and height was examined. As a control, an estimation equation based on sternal length was developed. Significant positive correlations were observed between each of the lumbar spine indices and height, with the PLV of the second lumbar vertebrate (PLV2) (R = 0.710), SPLV (R = 0.762), and LVTL (R = 0.761) showing the strongest correlation. R2 and standard error of estimation (SEE) were 0.622 and 4.926 cm for PLV2, 0.683 and 4.515 cm for SPLV, and 0.692 and 4.448 cm for LVTL, respectively. Furthermore, estimation equations based on sternal length often estimated higher values for elderly persons and did not take into account the effect of aging, while those based on PVL2, SPLV, and LVTL showed no correlation with age. In conclusion, we consider that our new formula for estimating height based on lumbar spine length, especially on PLV2, SPLV, and LVTL, is not affected by aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.