ArticlePloS one2026
Path planning for UAVs in complex terrain based on the PGD model: Algorithmic improvements combining feature extraction and reinforcement learning.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper proposes the PGD model for UAV path planning in complex terrain, addressing key challenges such as high-dimensional state processing, blind path exploration, and poor cross-scene adaptability. The PGD model integrates Transformer, GAN, and DDPG, forming a "compression-generation-optimization" closed-loop system. The Transformer module compresses high-dimensional terrain data, alleviating training bottlenecks, while the GAN module generates high-quality candidate paths, reducing ineffective exploration. DDPG then optimizes the path planning strategy efficiently. Experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of PGD on the UAVDT (suburban) and AirSim (canyon) datasets. In terms of path length (Pl), PGD achieves 20.0m/22.0m, compared to baseline models such as PPO-DRL (23.8m) and Soft Actor-Critic (24.0m). PGD also outperforms in collision rate (Cr) with 2.5%/3.0% and computational efficiency (Tc) with 13.5s/16.0s, respectively. The PGD model shows significant improvements in path planning efficiency and adaptability, particularly in high-complexity terrains. Compared to traditional models, PGD's multi-module synergy enhances feature correlation and physical path constraints, offering a novel framework for intelligent planning in complex environments. Future work will focus on enhancing model adaptability to extreme weather and multi-agent collaborative scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.