ArticlePloS one2026
Body-worn cameras to prevent workplace aggression among ticket inspectors: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundService and frontline personnel are among the occupational groups with the highest rates of workplace aggression. To address the risk of victimization, various preventive measures have been introduced, with body-worn cameras increasingly adopted. However, evidence of their effectiveness remains inconclusive, with existing studies heavily concentrated in U.S. policing contexts, limiting the generalizability of findings across settings. This study aims to strengthen the evidence base through a randomized controlled trial testing the preventive effect of body-worn cameras among ticket inspectors in Denmark.
methodsThe trial will involve approximately 60 inspectors employed by three Danish public transport companies. Randomization will occur at the shift level, yielding approximately 3,000 shifts in total. The main analysis compares wearing a camera versus not wearing a camera, pooling data from all three companies. A secondary analysis, restricted to two companies, additionally tests whether a visible badge notifying passengers of potential recording strengthens any preventive effect. In parallel, field observations of inspection workdays will be conducted to gain in-depth insights into how and why cameras may influence interactions. DISCUSSION: This study presents a rare randomized controlled trial on the preventive effect of body-worn cameras against workplace aggression outside a U.S. policing context. If the hypothesis of a preventive effect is confirmed, the findings will have direct practical implications for deploying this technology to reduce workplace aggression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.