ArticlePloS one2026
Exploring phonological complexity in statistical learning of artificial words.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study examined whether phonological complexity enhances auditory word learning within a statistical learning framework. Specifically, we tested if exposure to phonologically complex speech patterns (i.e., marked consonant clusters) facilitates the segmentation and generalization of both complex and simple artificial words.
methodSeventy-eight adults were randomly assigned to either a complex or simple pattern induction group and exposed to bisyllabic artificial words varying in onset complexity. Participants then heard an auditory stream containing both complex and simple words, followed by a wordlikeness rating task assessing both previously heard and novel items.
resultsExposure to complex speech patterns did not enhance wordlikeness ratings for either previously heard (stream) or novel (generalization) artificial words. Wordlikeness ratings were significantly higher for stream items than for generalization items, indicating sensitivity to exposure, but no reliable effects of induction condition or stimulus complexity were observed.
conclusionsFindings suggest that passive exposure to complex patterns does not enhance generalization within a statistical learning paradigm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.