ArticlePloS one2026
Machine learning-based prediction of acute and complicated appendicitis using readily available data in low-resource settings.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute appendicitis often presents diagnostic challenges, especially in pediatric and elderly patients. Delays can cause serious complications. While imaging aids diagnosis, it is not always accessible. Machine learning offers a promising solution. This study aimed to develop a simple, accurate model using basic demographic and laboratory data to improve diagnosis in low-resource settings. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective, single-center study analyzed 453 patients undergoing appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis. Clinical, laboratory, and histopathological data were collected and classified into normal, uncomplicated, or complicated appendicitis. Data preprocessing included feature encoding, scaling, and balancing. Seven machine learning models were trained and evaluated using stratified five-fold cross-validation, and interpretability was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).
resultsAmong 453 patients, appendicitis was confirmed in 68.87%, predominantly in males (p < 0.001). Patients with appendicitis were significantly older (p = 0.0012), exhibiting elevated white blood cells(WBC) count, neutrophils, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and lower lymphocytes (all p < 0.001). The Support Vector Classifier (SVC) performed best in classifying appendicitis (accuracy = 75.82%, ROC-AUC = 76.39%). SHAP analysis identified WBC, lymphocyte percentage, gender, age, and neutrophil percentage as influential predictors. For differentiating complicated versus uncomplicated appendicitis, SVC achieved moderate accuracy (70.19%) and ROC-AUC (76.33%), but low precision (14.85%) indicated challenges in minimizing false positives.
conclusionMachine learning models based on CBC and CRP show preliminary potential for predicting appendicitis, but given the surgical-only cohort and modest performance, further validation is needed before clinical use, particularly in low-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.