ArticlePloS one2026
Genomic characterization and prognostic significance of copy number alterations in Tunisian patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a heterogeneous malignancy characterized by various genomic alterations playing a crucial role in disease classification, prognosis, and response to treatment. However, molecular diagnosis and effective management of this hematological malignancy remain a major challenge, particularly in developing countries, including Tunisia. In this study, we aimed to conduct a detailed analysis of copy number alterations (CNAs) associated with ALL in a cohort of 60 primary samples from Tunisian patients. Using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), major genetic lesions, including IKZF1, CDKN2A/2B, PAX5, ETV6, BTG1, and genes located in the PAR1 region, were analyzed and their associations with clinical and laboratory features, as well as survival outcomes, were also evaluated. Our analysis revealed that 70% of patients had deletions and/or amplifications in at least one gene. The most frequently observed deletions were in CDKN2A/2B (33.3%, n = 20), IKZF1 (30%, n = 18), and PAX5 genes (25%, n = 15). BTG1 deletions were significantly associated with female gender, IKZF1 deletions were more frequent in adult patients, in those with elevated white blood cell (WBC) counts, and in cases involving the BCR::ABL1 translocation, while duplications of the PAR1 region were significantly associated with hyperdiploïdy. Regarding treatment response, cases of IKZF1 deletions showed a significant association with poor glucocorticoid response (GC) at day 8 of treatment and positive minimal residual disease (MRD) rates at days 33 and 63, particularly in B-ALL cases. Furthermore, patients with IKZF1 deletions were associated with significantly lower survival rates in both univariate and multivariate analyses compared to those without these deletions. Additionally, the integration of IKZF1 deletion status into risk stratification models revealed markedly different survival outcomes, highlighting its potential interest in developing new stratification algorithms. These results underscore the critical importance of molecular profiling, particularly IKZF1 status, for improving outcomes in ALL patients in Tunisia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.