ArticleOphthalmic research2026
Long-Term Follow-Up of Faricimab Intravitreal Injections in Naïve Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Article in Ophthalmic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ranibizumab port delivery system for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: Current evidence and surgical considerations.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of the study was to evaluate functional and anatomical changes at the 44-week follow-up in patients with naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with faricimab intravitreal injections (IVIs).
methodsFifty-four eyes of 54 patients with naïve active macular neovascularization and nAMD were enrolled at the Ophthalmology Clinic of University "G. d'Annunzio," Chieti-Pescara, Italy. All patients were scheduled for faricimab IVI. Each patient underwent complete ophthalmic examination including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts and optical coherence tomography. All measurements were evaluated at baseline, at week 20 and then according to fixed retreatment interval up to week 44. Fluorescein angiography and indocyanine green angiography were also performed at baseline. Main outcome measures were changes in BCVA, central macular thickness (CMT), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), intraretinal fluid presence, subfoveal subretinal fluid presence and thickness, the presence of pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs), and its maximum height (PED-MH).
resultsBCVA improved and CMT reduced significantly from baseline to week 44 (p = 0.002 and p = 0.020, respectively) in the overall sample with a higher significant improvement from baseline to week 20 (p < 0.001 for both parameters) and no additional significant improvement from week 20 to week 44 in the overall sample (p = 0.348 and p = 0.146, respectively). At week 20, 72.3% of patients were in the Q12/Q16 interval. Patients in the Q8 interval showed significant improvement in BCVA (p < 0.001) and significant reduction of CMT (p = 0.008) from baseline to week 44, respectively. PED-MH as well showed a significant reduction from baseline to week 44 (p < 0.001). Patients in the Q12 interval showed significant improvement in BCVA (p = 0.030) and significant reduction of CMT, SFCT, and PED-MH from baseline to week 36 (p < 0.001). Patients in the Q16 interval showed significant reduction of BCVA during follow-up (p = 0.026). CMT, SFCT, and PED-MH were significantly reduced from baseline to week 44 (p < 0.001).
conclusionFaricimab showed efficacy in the treatment of naïve nAMD patients with an improvement of many anatomical and functional parameters at 44 weeks, allowing the maintenance of a treatment regimen for most patients equal to or greater than 12 weeks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.