Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41632737›Full record

SynthesisDigestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Nasopharyngeal Methicillin-Resistant <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> Carriage and Risk of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy-Related Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Islam Mohamed, Samuel Kim, Mira Bhatia, Samiya Azim, Robert Zhang, Mira Malavia, Olivia Sappington, Hazem Abosheaishaa, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Syed Hammad Rahman and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Islam MohamedDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Missouri Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, USA, islamh3255@gmail.com.
Samuel KimSchool of Medicine, University of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Mira BhatiaSchool of Medicine, University of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Samiya AzimSchool of Medicine, University of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Robert ZhangSchool of Medicine, University of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Mira MalaviaSchool of Medicine, University of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Olivia SappingtonSchool of Medicine, University of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Hazem AbosheaishaaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Dushyant Singh DahiyaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Motility, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Syed Hammad RahmanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Methodist Medical Center Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Omar T AhmedDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Nikki DuongDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA, nduong91@stanford.edu.
Asim ShujaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

<p>Introduction: Enteral feeding via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is commonly used for patients requiring long-term nutritional support. However, PEG insertion carries a risk of infection, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) peristomal infections. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between MRSA colonization and the risk of PEG-related infections.

methodsA systematic search was conducted in four major databases - Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Scopus - focusing on studies reporting MRSA colonization and PEG-related infections. Data were analyzed using RevMan v5.3. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes using a random-effects model. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.

resultsFive studies encompassing 286 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Among them, 77 patients were nasopharyngeal MRSA-positive, and 209 were MRSA-negative. MRSA colonization was significantly associated with an increased risk of PEG-related peristomal infection (OR: 24.31; 95% CI: 5.20-113.65; p < 0.0001). Moderate heterogeneity was observed among studies (I2 = 69%, p = 0.01), likely reflecting differences in study design and infection definition; however, the overall association remained statistically significant.

conclusionNasopharyngeal MRSA colonization is strongly associated with a higher risk of PEG-site infection. These findings highlight the importance of MRSA screening and consideration of colonization status prior to PEG tube insertion. Enhanced infection control strategies should be implemented in MRSA-positive patients to reduce the risk of complications. However, given the limited number of included studies (n = 5; 286 patients), these conclusions should be interpreted with caution. Larger, well-designed studies are needed to validate these associations and identify the most effective preventive measures for MRSA-colonized individuals undergoing PEG placement. </p>.

Indexed as

GastrostomyMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusNasopharynxStaphylococcal InfectionsCarrier StateHumansRisk FactorsMeta-analysisMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriageNasopharyngealPercutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy-related infectionSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41632737
PMCPMC13030897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.