ArticleBlood advances2026
Effectiveness of health care transition interventions for sickle cell disease.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractEffective transition programs are essential for adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease (SCD), yet their long-term impact remains unexplored. The St. Jude SCD Transition Program provides structured transition interventions, such as disease education, personal health record (PHR) communication training, transition skills-building, academic guidance, and early adult care introduction for patients aged 12 to 25 years. This 13-year retrospective cohort study evaluated program effectiveness on first adult visit attendance, successful transfer to adult care, adult ambulatory and acute care use, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Among 638 patients, 74.5% attended their first adult visit and 40.0% successfully transferred to adult care (2 visits within the first year after transfer). Increased participation in nearly all transition interventions was associated with first adult visit attendance, and all interventions were associated with successful transfer. In-person SCD education and early introduction to adult care were independently associated with first adult visit attendance, whereas in-person SCD education and PHR training were independently associated with successful transfer. A predictive model incorporating intervention exposure and demographics yielded an area under the curve of 0.81 for attendance at the first adult visit (95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.88; sensitivity 0.76, specificity 0.70). PHR training was associated with adult ambulatory use up to 3 years after transfer and improved early adulthood HRQOL. No interventions were associated with acute care use. Transition interventions that improve disease literacy, communication, and care transfer processes are linked to better transition outcomes and HRQOL, though sustained adult care engagement remains low. Future research is needed to promote adult care engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.