ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
Safety and Efficacy of CT-Guided Lung Biopsy in Elderly Patients age 75 Years and Older: A Single-Centre Retrospective Comparative Study.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionCT-guided biopsy has good diagnostic accuracy, but adverse events such as pneumothorax are common. There are few reports on the safety and efficacy of CT-guided biopsy in the elderly.MethodsThis was a retrospective single-centre cohort study. Patients who underwent CT-guided lung biopsy between February 2017 and August 2024 were included. Patient background, disease background, examination status, and adverse events were ascertained. Elderly were defined as those aged 75 years and older. The primary outcome was the incidence of all adverse events, and the secondary outcomes were the incidence of pneumothorax and diagnostic accuracy. Categorical variables were compared by Chi-square test, and continuous variables by t-test. Multivariable analysis was performed by logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, lung comorbidities, and radiological findings of target lesion.ResultsThere were significant differences between the two groups in ECOG-PS and the distance from the surface to pleura and target. In the primary outcome, any adverse events occurred in 207 patients (56.2%), with no significant difference between elderly (97/180, 53.9%) and non-elderly (110/188, 58.5%) patients (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.