ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Probing genomic language models: Nucleotide Generative Pretrained Transformer and the role of pretraining in learned representations.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Graph-based RNA structural representation reveals determinants of subcellular localization.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The value and nature of the representations learned during the pretraining of genomic language models (gLMs) remain actively debated. We introduce Nucleotide Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT), a decoder-only transformer with single-nucleotide tokenization, to dissect the role of pretraining. Through experiments varying repetitive element (RE) weights during pretraining (0.0-1.0), comparative finetuning against random initialization, linear probing of internal representations, and sparse autoencoder (SAE)-based interpretability, we evaluated the impact of pretraining and how REs in genomic data influence model learning. Models with moderate RE downweighting (0.5) consistently achieved optimal performance across seven genomic classification tasks, with pretrained models providing substantial performance gains over baselines. SAE feature annotation via sequence alignment revealed substantial RE-associated patterns in the pretrained model internal representations, suggesting that REs-which comprise 30%-60% of mammalian genomes-may dominate the pretraining objective. Our findings support the utility of pretraining and underscore the need for pretraining strategies that better accommodate repetitive sequences across the genome while also fostering the learning of less common but biologically important representations. This study highlights a key challenge for gLMs: ensuring that models broadly learn functional genomic syntax beyond simply recognizing ubiquitous repeats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.