Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41632478›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2026

Blended Delivery of a Primary Care Parenting Program for Child Development: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Susan M Chang, Joanne A Smith, Amika S Wright, Julia Rowe-Porter, Kemisha Shaw-Kelly, Florencia Lopez-Boo, Susan P Walker

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Susan M ChangCaribbean Institute for Health Research, The University of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica.
Joanne A SmithCaribbean Institute for Health Research, The University of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica.
Amika S WrightCaribbean Institute for Health Research, The University of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica.
Julia Rowe-PorterFamily Health Unit, Ministry of Health & Wellness, Kingston, Jamaica.
Kemisha Shaw-KellyFamily Health Unit, Ministry of Health & Wellness, Kingston, Jamaica.
Florencia Lopez-BooInter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC.
Susan P WalkerCaribbean Institute for Health Research, The University of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: There is substantial evidence that programs that build parents' abilities to support early learning benefit children's development. Evidence is needed on how to integrate and scale these programs within government services. Objective: To determine whether a parenting program implemented by government primary health care services and combining in-person and remote delivery benefits children's development and parenting attitudes and behaviors. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this single-blind randomized clinical trial, enrollment began in July 2022 in primary health care centers in Jamaica. The intervention was phased in from September 2022 to August 2023 and lasted 8 months. Data collection ended in April 2024. Families with children aged 3 to 28 months from communities served by the centers were identified by health staff. Following eligibility checks and informed consent, families were randomly assigned to intervention or waiting list control. Intervention: The intervention aimed to strengthen parents' skills in helping their child learn through play and responsive interactions. Community health workers used a curriculum with age-appropriate play and language activities and made fortnightly contacts with families, alternating between home visits and telephone calls. Main Outcomes and Measures: Child development was measured with the Griffiths Mental Development Scales and parenting behaviors (involvement, responsivity, acceptance, and learning materials) with the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME). Effect size (ES) was calculated by dividing the regression coefficient by the pooled-sample SD. Results: A total of 627 children were enrolled (311 intervention and 316 control; 322 [51.4%] male). At follow-up, 491 children (78.3%) were assessed, 237 (76.2%) of those in the intervention group and 254 (80.4%) in the control group. Children's mean (SD) age at follow-up was 27.0 (5.8) months in the control and 27.0 (6.1) months in the intervention group. A total of 393 mothers (62.7%) had completed secondary school. There were no significant differences in follow-up rate or characteristics between groups. Intention-to-treat multivariate regression analyses with inverse probability weights showed benefits for children's overall developmental quotient (ES, 0.17 SD; 95% CI, 0.01-0.33 SD), fine motor ability score (ES, 0.19 SD; 95% CI, 0.03-0.36 SD), and parent behaviors (HOME score ES, 0.25 SD; 95% CI, 0.08-0.41 SD). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of a parenting program delivered through primary health care, the intervention benefited child development and parenting. Findings suggest combining in-person and remote methods may be a useful strategy for scaling. Trial Registration: ISRCTN Registry Identifier: ISRCTN11059214.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentParentingParentsPrimary Health CareChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleSingle-Blind Method

Identifiers

PMID41632478
PMCPMC12869336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.