Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41632475›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Socioeconomic Status and Postpartum Depression Risk After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision, Based on State Trigger Laws.

Onur Baser, Facundo Sepulveda, Yuanqing Lu, Amy Endrizal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Onur BaserSchool of Public Health, City University of New York, New York, New York.
Facundo SepulvedaDepartment of Economics, University of Santiago, Santiago, Chile.
Yuanqing LuColumbia Data Analytics, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Amy EndrizalColumbia Data Analytics, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The 2022 Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization resulted in immediate abortion bans or severe restrictions in 22 US states. While mental health consequences of restricted abortion access have been suggested, their distribution across socioeconomic strata remain unclear for postpartum depression (PPD) among Medicaid populations. Objective: To assess associations of state-level abortion bans enacted after Dobbs with the incidence of PPD, focusing on socioeconomic status (SES) differences. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used a difference-in-differences (DD) analysis for Medicaid claims data from Kythera Labs (approximately 60% of US Medicaid population) from January 2019 to December 2024. Women and adolescents aged 12 to 55 years with pregnancies resulting in live births or stillbirths were stratified into SES terciles based on zip code-level census data. Exposure: State-level abortion bans or restrictions implemented after Dobbs, defined by residence in trigger law states. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was incidence of PPD within 12 months following delivery, identified through validated claims-based algorithms. Results: The study comprised 102 597 individuals pre-Dobbs (mean [SD] age, 27.21 [5.82] years; 47 305 individuals in trigger states and 55 292 individuals in nontrigger states) and 61 113 individuals post-Dobbs (mean [SD] age, 27.48 [5.92] years; 30 451 individuals in trigger states and 30 662 individuals in nontrigger states). Individuals in trigger states were younger than individuals in nontrigger states both pre-Dobbs (mean [SD] age, 26.53 [5.69] years vs 27.97 [5.84] years) and post-Dobbs (mean [SD] age, 26.61 [5.77] years vs 28.34 [5.94] years). Both pre- and post-Dobbs, individuals in trigger states were more likely to reside in rural areas (pre-Dobbs: 10 562 individuals [22.33%] vs 10 079 individuals [18.23%]; post-Dobbs: 6739 individuals [22.13%] vs 5220 individuals [17.02%]) and low-SES areas (pre-Dobbs: 20 136 individuals [42.57%] vs 13 771 individuals [24.91%]; post-Dobbs: 12 924 individuals [42.44%] vs 7283 [23.75%]); they were less likely to have obstetrical complications (pre-Dobbs: 31 243 individuals [66.05%] vs 42 780 individuals [77.37%]; post-Dobbs: 21 052 individuals [69.13%] vs 24 577 individuals [80.15%]) or maternal complications (pre-Dobbs:7732 individuals [16.34%] vs 10 839 of individuals [19.60%]; post-Dobbs: 5779 of 30 451 individuals [19.04%] vs 6508 individuals [21.17%]). Women with lowest SES residing in trigger states experienced a 9.0% relative increase in PPD diagnoses post-Dobbs vs similar women in nontrigger states (DD coefficient, 0.090; 95% CI, 0.035-0.146; P = .001). No associations were observed in middle or high SES groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, state-level abortion bans following Dobbs were associated with a disproportionate increase in the risk of PPD among women and adolescents in low-SES communities. These findings underscore the need for targeted mental health support and policy interventions to mitigate the unequal burden of such legislation on vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAbortion, LegalDepression, PostpartumSocial ClassAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansIncidenceMedicaidMiddle AgedPregnancyRetrospective StudiesSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthSupreme Court Decisions

Identifiers

PMID41632475
PMCPMC12869335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.