ArticleGeroScience2026
Polluting cooking fuels and life satisfaction among middle-aged and older adults: a cross-sectional study from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polluting cooking fuels are a major source of household air pollution and may reduce life satisfaction (LS). Yet, this relationship remains unexplored in India where polluting fuel use is still widespread. We utilized cross-sectional data from the Longitudinal Aging Study in India, a nationally representative study of individuals aged 45 years and above. Cooking fuel type was classified as households using clean fuels (CF) or non-CF. Based on kitchen type, non-CF was categorized into non-CF in separate kitchen, and non-CF without separate kitchen. We used multivariable regression to examine the association between polluting cooking fuels and LS and explored gender differences in this association. The analytical sample comprised 62,822 respondents (mean age 59.56 ± 10.52 years). The use of non-CF in separate and non-separate kitchen was 27.08% (n = 17,010) and 18.89% (n = 11,868), respectively. We observed that LS scores were highest among households using CF, followed by those using non-CF in separate kitchen, and lowest among households using non-CF without separate room for cooking. Additionally, in the fully adjusted model, a dose-response association with LS was observed corresponding to different levels of polluting cooking fuels (non-CF in separate kitchen: β = -0.51 [95% CI: -0.71, -0.31]; non-CF without separate kitchen: β = -1.42 [95% CI: -1.65, -1.19]). Multiple sensitivity analyses support the robustness of our findings. Gender was a significant effect modifier, with the interaction model revealing a stronger negative association between non-CF use and LS among women than among men. Our findings highlight the need for policies that promote an equitable clean fuel transition to enhance life satisfaction and well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41632425What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.