ArticleInsights into imaging2026
Environmental sustainability of ultrasound-guided core-needle breast biopsy: a survey on current practices by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI).
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIn the context of a global appraisal of the environmental impact of radiology, this survey among members of the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) investigated procedural aspects of ultrasound-guided core-needle breast biopsy that may impact its environmental sustainability. MATERIALS AND
methodsA 25-item online questionnaire, developed by a panel of nine breast imaging experts, was distributed from September 25th to December 25th, 2024, within the EUSOBI mailing list and social media platforms. The survey investigated materials routinely used for ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsies, waste disposal practices, the relationship between perceived procedural hygiene levels and self-reported frequency of post-procedural infectious complications, and results' communication methods. Replies were analysed with descriptive and non-parametric statistics.
resultsAmong the 787/823 respondents (95.6%) who routinely perform ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy, most (460/787, 58.4%) perceived to attain aseptic conditions, without significant associations (p = 0.334) of hygiene levels with post-procedural infectious complications (never seen by 549/776 respondents, 70.7%). For most disposable materials, the majority of respondents used no more than one unit per procedure, including sterile gloves (551/787, 70.0%), sterile drapes (651/787, 82.7%), and sterile gel packets (729/787, 92.6%), also avoiding to use prepackaged biopsy kits (424/787, 53.9%). However, most respondents did not use recycling bins (404/787, 51.3%) and employed at least one resource-intensive modality to communicate benign results (in-person or by letter, 584/787, 74.2%).
conclusionProcedural aspects of ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy carrying an environmental impact vary widely. In the absence of significant associations between perceived hygiene levels and post-procedural infectious complications, resource-intensive habits could be safely streamlined to improve sustainability. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This EUSOBI survey demonstrates that, despite widely varying procedural aspects in ultrasound-guided core-needle breast biopsy, higher perceived sterility levels are not associated with fewer infections, highlighting opportunities to safely reduce resource use and environmental impact. KEY POINTS: This EUSOBI survey investigated how procedural habits and the use and amount of material in ultrasound-guided core-needle breast biopsy impact its environmental sustainability. Procedural aspects varied widely among the 787/823 respondents who routinely perform ultrasound-guided core-needle breast biopsy. While some economically driven sustainable behaviours are already in place, there are several opportunities to reduce materials use and waste. As no association was found between perceived hygiene levels and post-procedural infections, resource-intensive hygiene-related practices could be streamlined to improve sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.