ReviewHeart failure reviews2026
Hyponatraemia in heart failure: a mechanistic approach to contemporary management.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hyponatraemia remains the most prevalent electrolyte disturbance in heart failure, complicating clinical management and correlating with adverse outcomes. While traditionally viewed as a biomarker of disease severity, mounting evidence suggests that hyponatraemia reflects specific pathophysiological mechanisms that demand targeted intervention alongside standard decongestion strategies. This mini review synthesises contemporary evidence to provide clinicians with an updated, mechanistically grounded approach to hyponatraemia in heart failure. We emphasise the critical distinction between dilutional hypervolaemic states driven by arginine vasopressin dysregulation and depletional hypovolaemic states arising from aggressive diuresis or sodium losses. Recent trials challenge longstanding practices: fluid restriction in stable chronic heart failure shows no quality-of-life benefit despite guideline recommendations, whilst emerging biomarkers such as early urine chloride offer promise in identifying diuretic resistance. We critically appraise the role of vasopressin antagonists, which correct sodium biochemically but lack mortality benefit, and explore oral urea as a pragmatic alternative supported by recent observational data. For acute severe presentations, we detail hypertonic saline protocols with strict correction limits and discuss proactive desmopressin strategies to prevent osmotic demyelination. Important knowledge gaps persist, including optimal diagnostic algorithms in diuretic-exposed patients, patient-centred outcome data for sodium-correcting therapies, and validation of safe-correction protocols. Overall, this review equips clinicians to integrate mechanistic understanding with evidence-based practice whilst identifying priorities for future investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41632334What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.