Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41632313›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2026

Effect of nanoalloying on dynamic thermophysical response of polycrystalline copper-tantalum.

Mahesh Kumar Gupta, Santosh Kumar Rai, Vinay Panwar, R P Mahapatra, Abhishek Tevatia

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mahesh Kumar GuptaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Delhi-NCR Campus, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Modinagar, Ghaziabad, U.P. 201204, India.
Santosh Kumar RaiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Delhi-NCR Campus, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Modinagar, Ghaziabad, U.P. 201204, India. 08rai.santosh@gmail.com.
Vinay PanwarMechanical Engineering Department, Netaji Subhas University of Technology, Dwarka, New Delhi, 110078, India. vinaypanwar86@gmail.com.
R P MahapatraDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Delhi-NCR Campus, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Modinagar, Ghaziabad, U.P. 201204, India.
Abhishek TevatiaMechanical Engineering Department, Netaji Subhas University of Technology, Dwarka, New Delhi, 110078, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextIn the present work, the investigation of polycrystalline nanomaterials has been extended to a specific nanoalloy of copper and tantalum having a 9:1 atomic concentration. The study aims to analyze the influence of temperature and average grain size (AGS) on the mechanical behavior of the polycrystalline Cu-Ta nanoalloy. The results indicate that the critical grain size of polycrystalline 9Cu-Ta is smaller than that of pure Cu. The critical grain size of polycrystalline Cu (6.86 nm) is reduced to 3.89 nm with the addition of approximately 10% Ta atoms. This reduction is attributed to the combined effects of dislocation slip and subgrain strengthening mechanisms. Furthermore, the investigation highlights the variation of mechanical properties with increasing temperature and the influence of temperature on the critical grain size. The analysis also reveals the existence of distinct plastic deformation mechanisms corresponding to the critical grain size in the polycrystalline Cu-Ta nanoalloy.

methodsMolecular dynamic simulation has been carried out under a fixed strain rate of 1.0 × 10

Indexed as

Atomistic simulationGrain sizeMechanical propertiesNanoalloyPolycrystallineTemperature

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.