ArticleSkeletal radiology2026
Prevalence and imaging characteristics of the transverse trochlear ridge on elbow MRI and radiographs in youths.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe transverse trochlear ridge (TTR) is an anatomic variant of the ulnar trochlear groove. This study evaluated the prevalence and imaging characteristics of the TTR on MRI and radiographs in children, adolescents, and young adults. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective analysis included 178 MRI examinations and 95 corresponding radiographs of patients aged 4-25 years. The presence or absence of the TTR was evaluated. The width, height, and depth of the TTR were measured. The sensitivity and specificity of radiography to detect TTRs were evaluated compared with MRI as the reference standard. Binomial logistic regression analysis was used to compare the effects of age and gender on the prevalence of TTR.
resultsTTR was observed on 149 of 178 (83.7%) elbow MRIs. Mean width, height, and depth were 20.6 ± 3.0 mm, 4.2 ± 1.2 mm, and 2.0 ± 0.7 mm, respectively. Comparing increasing age in years with the prevalence of the TTR revealed a statistically significant odds ratio of 1.119 (95% CI; p = 0.012). The maximum predicted probability was a prevalence of 96% for TTR at the age of 25. Sensitivity and specificity values of the TTR on radiographs were 29.6% and 92.9%. Cohen's kappa for the inter-rater agreement for the prevalence of the TTR on MRI was 0.740.
conclusionsThe predicted prevalence of TTR demonstrated an age-dependent increase in the prevalence up to 17 years of age. The size of the TTR also demonstrated an age‑dependent increase during adolescence. The high frequency of TTR on MRI indicates that TTR represents a common variant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41632284What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.