Trial reportUrolithiasis2026
Comparative evaluation of flexible ureterorenoscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the management of renal pelvic stones less than 2 cm with high attenuation value in pediatric patients: a prospective randomized study.
Trial report in Urolithiasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Methodological considerations regarding the study by Mahmoud et al. on pediatric RIRS versus mini-PCNL.Urolithiasis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) compared with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) in children with renal pelvic stones < 2 cm and density > 1000 HU. A prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted at Beni-Suef University Hospitals including 70 children aged 3–14 years. Eligible participants had a single renal pelvic stone < 2 cm with density > 1000 HU on low-dose non-contrast CT and were randomized equally to undergo RIRS or mini-PCNL (n = 35 each). The stone-free rates at one month were 91.4% for RIRS and 94.3% for mini-PCNL (p = 0.643). RIRS was associated with shorter operative time (72.7 vs. 80.5 min), reduced hospital stay (1.1 vs. 1.3 days), shorter catheterization (1.2 vs. 2.1 days), and lower radiation exposure (34.6 vs. 115.1 s) (all p < 0.05). Hemoglobin drop was minimal and not significant in RIRS (0.01 g/dL; p = 0.097) and greater in mini-PCNL (0.74 g/dL; p < 0.001). Complication rates were similar (11.4% vs. 17.1%; p = 0.550). Both RIRS and mini-PCNL are effective and safe for managing pediatric renal stones < 2 cm with high density. RIRS offers comparable efficacy with less invasiveness, shorter recovery, and lower radiation exposure. Mini-PCNL remains a valuable option in anatomically complex or lower-calyceal cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.