ArticleHNO2026
[Otorhinolaryngology specialist training in Germany in the context of the hospital reform].
Article in HNO, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn otorhinolaryngology, the majority of specialist training takes place in inpatient facilities. Against the backdrop of current structural reforms in the hospital sector, it is necessary to collect fundamental structural data of these training institutions. To date, no centrally collected data exist that capture the number of inpatient training centers, the number of trainees and authorized trainers, or the scope of training accreditation. The aim of this study was therefore to establish a nationwide baseline assessment to support evaluation of the potential impact of the ongoing hospital reform. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC) conducted a nationwide digital survey among the heads of ENT departments in Germany. The survey collected structural and capacity-related parameters relevant to specialist training.
resultsA total of 95 fully completed questionnaires were returned (response rate 54.9%). All federal states were represented (32 university and 63 non-university hospitals). In 2024, 84 clinics (88,4 %) reported more than 1500 inpatient cases. On average, 1.5 physicians per institution held formal authorization to conduct specialist training. The number of trainees remained stable in 56.8% of clinics and increased in 32.6%. Overall, 96.8% of departments had full accreditation for the complete 5‑year training period.
conclusionOtorhinolaryngology specialist training in Germany is broadly available and delivered at a consistently high level within hospitals. Based on the collected data, a stable and robust training structure can be expected to persist, even when considering potential effects of the Hospital Care Improvement Act (Krankenhausversorgungsverbesserungsgesetz, KHVVG). These training capacities remain essential for ensuring nationwide high-quality specialist care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.