Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41632268›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2026

Ultra-low dose protocol on photon-counting computed tomography as an alternative to radiographic shunt series in the diagnosis of mechanical ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications - an ex vivo phantom study for children and adults.

Berk Yildirim, Aydin Demircioğlu, Raya Ocker-Serger, Laura Valentina Klüner, Marcel Drews, Sebastian Zensen, Hanna Styczen, Maximilian Schüßler, Yan Li, Benjamin Schröer and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Berk YildirimInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany. berkyildirim98@gmail.com.
Aydin DemircioğluInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Raya Ocker-SergerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Laura Valentina KlünerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Marcel DrewsInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Sebastian ZensenInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Hanna StyczenInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Maximilian SchüßlerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Yan LiInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Benjamin SchröerFaculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Denise SchönbeckDepartment of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Johannes Wesling Medical Center, Minden, Germany.
Christoph MönninghoffDepartment of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Johannes Wesling Medical Center, Minden, Germany.
Thiemo DingerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Philipp DammannDepartment of Neurosurgery, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Ulrich SureDepartment of Neurosurgery, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Helmut SchlattlDepartment of Medical and Occupational Radiation Protection, Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Oberschleißheim, Germany.
Patrizia KunertDepartment of Medical and Occupational Radiation Protection, Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Oberschleißheim, Germany.
Michael ForstingInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Cornelius DeuschlInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Marcel OpitzInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Denise BosInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe standard modality for the diagnosis of ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt failure is the radiographic shunt series (RSS). However, ultra-low dose computed tomography (ULD-CT) may replace RSS. The aim of this study was to compare the radiation doses of RSS and ULD-CT in the diagnosis of mechanical shunt failure in human phantoms including pediatric phantoms and to further reduce the total CT dose by reducing the topogram radiation.

methodsMechanical VP shunt complications were placed on human phantoms representing ages of 1, 5, 10 and 30 years. RSS and ULD-CT were performed on each phantom with different radiation doses of the topogram with varying tube currents (10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 mAs). Effective doses of RSS and ULD-CT were estimated by using conversion factors.

resultsULD-CT demonstrated lower effective doses than RSS in phantoms representing ages 5, 10 and 30 years, while successfully depicting all mechanical shunt complications. However, higher effective doses were assessed for ULD-CT scans of the 1-year phantom than RSS. The effective doses for RSS and ULD-CT (utilizing 10 mAs topograms), respectively, were estimated as follows: 1-year: 0.056 vs. 0.133 mSv; 5-year: 0.186 vs. 0.123 mSv; 10-year: 0.240 vs. 0.107 mSv; 30-year: 0.641 vs. 0.076 mSv.

conclusionThis study demonstrated ULD-CT as an alternative to RSS for the detection of mechanical VP shunt complications, reducing radiation doses in phantoms equivalent to 5 years of age and older while demonstrating the complications equally to RSS. This may be of clinical interest, especially in children due to the reduction of radiation risks.

Indexed as

Radiation DosageTomography, X-Ray ComputedVentriculoperitoneal ShuntAdultChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantPhantoms, ImagingComputed tomographyRadiation protectionShunt, ventriculoperitoneal

Identifiers

PMID41632268
PMCPMC13407748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.