Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41632241›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

TLS-VBQ: a novel MRI-based bone quality score for opportunistic osteoporosis screening in spinal surgery candidates.

Fayao Yan, Tongrui Zhang, Yongqi Zhang, Yu Yao, Zheng Li, Xingjie Jiang

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fayao YanNo.20 Xisi Road, Chongchuan District, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Tongrui ZhangNo.20 Xisi Road, Chongchuan District, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Yongqi ZhangNo.20 Xisi Road, Chongchuan District, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Yu YaoNo.20 Xisi Road, Chongchuan District, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Zheng LiNo.753 Jianghai Middle Road, Qidong City, Qidong People's Hospital: Nantong University Affiliated Qidong Hospital, Nantong, China.
Xingjie JiangNo.20 Xisi Road, Chongchuan District, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China. tdfyjxj@ntu.edu.cn.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from Jiangsu Provincial Research Hospital:YJXYY202204. YJXYY202204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpportunistic screening for osteoporosis remains underutilized in spinal surgery candidates, despite the critical impact of bone quality on postoperative outcomes. While the L1-4 vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score derived from MRI has been proposed as an alternative to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), its reliability is limited in the presence of vertebral fractures or instrumentation. We introduce the TLS-VBQ score, a novel MRI-based metric that samples T11, T12, L3, and S1, to overcome these limitations.

methodsIn this retrospective multicenter study, 218 patients undergoing spinal surgery with preoperative T1-weighted MRI and DXA were included. The TLS-VBQ score was calculated using signal intensities from T11, T12, L3, and S1, normalized to cerebrospinal fluid at L3. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and robustness was tested by simulating single-level vertebral exclusions.

resultsThe TLS-VBQ score demonstrated a stronger correlation with DXA T-scores (r = - 0.772, p < 0.001) than the conventional L1-4 VBQ (r = - 0.708, p < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) for TLS-VBQ was 0.854, significantly higher than that of L1-4 VBQ (0.825, DeLong p < 0.05). TLS-VBQ maintained an AUC > 0.85 even with simulated exclusion of T12 or S1, whereas L1-4 VBQ dropped below 0.80 when L1 or L4 was excluded. Inter-reader reliability was also higher for TLS-VBQ (ICC = 0.914).

conclusionThe TLS-VBQ score is a robust and reproducible MRI-based tool for assessing bone quality in spinal surgery candidates. It outperforms the conventional L1-4 VBQ in diagnostic accuracy, resilience to vertebral-level exclusions, and inter-observer consistency. TLS-VBQ offers a practical, non-invasive method for opportunistic osteoporosis screening, facilitating early intervention without additional scans or radiation.

Indexed as

Bone DensityMagnetic Resonance ImagingOsteoporosisAbsorptiometry, PhotonAgedFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesBone qualityMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)OsteoporosisTLS-VBQVertebral bone quality (VBQ)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.