ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2026
Expanded Indications in Advanced Endoscopic Resection of Malignant Gastrointestinal Lesions.
Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Is Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Entering Into a New Era?Journal of digestive diseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewEndoscopic resection (ER) has transformed the management of early gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies by offering curative treatment with low morbidity and organ preservation. Traditionally restricted to mucosal disease with negligible risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM), recent advances in technique and risk stratification have prompted a re-evaluation of ER indications for esophageal, gastric, and colorectal cancers. This review summarizes the oncologic rationale, current evidence, and emerging technologies supporting the safe expansion of ER indications across GI malignancies. RECENT FINDING: s: Refined histopathologic criteria, enhanced en-bloc resection through endoscopic submucosal dissection, and the introduction of endoscopic full-thickness resection have expanded curative resection to select early GI malignancies previously considered surgical. Clinical outcomes from large series demonstrate comparable long-term survival to surgery when rigorous selection and surveillance criteria are applied, while minimizing morbidity. Molecular biomarkers, artificial intelligence (AI)-based predictive models, and sentinel node mapping are promising tools to further improve risk assessment for occult LNM. Expansion of ER indications for early GI cancers is feasible and increasingly practiced in expert centers with outcomes approximating those of surgical resection. Ongoing integration of precision diagnostics, molecular profiling, and AI-driven risk models promises to further refine patient selection. However, widespread adoption should proceed within structured, evidence-based frameworks to prevent undertreatment of potentially curable disease and maintain oncologic integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.