Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41632207›Full record

ReviewMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2026

Complement in brain and eye disease: shared mechanisms, convergent pathologies, and common therapeutic opportunities.

Jacqui Nimmo, Matthew Bright, Zhizhong Yang, Laura Elisabeth Nicholls, Bryan Paul Morgan, Nikoleta Daskoulidou, Wioleta Milena Zelek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neuroinflammation in glaucoma: a myriad of cellular pathways and players.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jacqui Nimmo *UK Dementia Research Institute Cardiff, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF235NQ, UK.
Matthew Bright *UK Dementia Research Institute Cardiff, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF235NQ, UK.
Zhizhong YangUK Dementia Research Institute Cardiff, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF235NQ, UK.
Laura Elisabeth NichollsUK Dementia Research Institute Cardiff, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF235NQ, UK.
Bryan Paul MorganUK Dementia Research Institute Cardiff, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF235NQ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4075-7676
Nikoleta Daskoulidou *UK Dementia Research Institute Cardiff, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF235NQ, UK. DaskoulidouN1@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7782-1232
Wioleta Milena Zelek *UK Dementia Research Institute Cardiff, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF235NQ, UK. zelekw@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2230-3550

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain and eye share striking anatomical, physiological, and immunological similarities. Both are protected by specialised vascular barriers, the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and blood-retinal barrier (BRB) respectively, that maintain homeostasis through tightly regulated cellular and molecular mechanisms. Increasing evidence implicates complement dysregulation as a key driver of neurodegeneration in both organs, contributing to disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Genetic and molecular studies highlight overlapping mechanisms, with variants in complement regulators influencing susceptibility to both retinal and brain pathologies. Locally synthesised complement components modulate glial activation, vascular integrity, and synaptic remodelling at both sites and, when dysregulated, contribute to chronic inflammation, synapse loss and neuronal degradation. Despite these shared pathways, therapeutic development has progressed asymmetrically; several complement therapeutics are already in the clinic for AMD and other ocular pathologies, while none are yet in use for brain diseases. This is in part a consequence of the accessibility of the eye where complement targeted drugs can be directly delivered and impact on pathology monitored, difficult in the brain. Lessons learned from the eye, including local delivery to overcome challenges of barrier penetration, may help accelerate development of complement therapeutics for the brain. Here we present a brief perspective that integrates current understanding of complement-mediated mechanisms across brain and eye, emphasising clues from convergent pathophysiology and ocular translational successes.

Indexed as

BrainBrain DiseasesComplement System ProteinsEye DiseasesAlzheimer DiseaseAnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierBlood-Retinal BarrierComplement ActivationHumansMacular DegenerationComplement System Proteins

Identifiers

PMID41632207
PMCPMC12868058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.