Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41632157›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Adolescents' and Young Adults' Receipt of Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling.

Brooke Whitfield, Tracey A Wilkinson, Laura D Lindberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brooke WhitfieldReproductive Equity Action Lab (REAL), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison.
Tracey A WilkinsonDivision of Children's Health Services Research, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Laura D LindbergDepartment of Urban-Global Public Health, Rutgers School of Public Health, Newark, New Jersey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Access to person-centered contraceptive counseling (PCCC) is critical for adolescents and young adults. There is limited data on the quality of contraceptive counseling that young people are receiving in the US. Objective: To assess the quality of contraceptive counseling received by adolescents and the association with use of a preferred method of contraception. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study used US population-based data from the 2022 to 2023 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). Participants included self-identified female respondents who had a contraceptive care visit in the past year and responded to the PCCC items. The analytic sample included 261 adolescent respondents aged 15 to 19 years, 276 young adult respondents aged 20 to 24 years, and 1506 adult respondents aged 25 years or older. Data were analyzed from December 2024 to July 2025. Main Outcomes and Measures: Receipt of PCCC and preferred contraceptive method use. Multivariable logistic regression analyses and 95% CIs were used to assess data. Results: This study analyzed data from 2043 self-identified female respondents. The sample was nationally representative, with 12.8% (95% CI, 10.2%-15.8%) of respondents identifying as Black, 19.5% (95% CI, 15.7%-23.9%) as Hispanic, and 58.6% (95% CI, 53.8%-63.3%) as White. Additionally, 57.6% (95% CI, 53.4%-61.8%) lived above 250% of the federal poverty line, and 66.1% (95% CI, 62.7%-69.2%) received birth control services from a private doctor's office or health maintenance organizations facility. Receipt of PCCC was low across all age groups. However, adolescents aged 15 to 19 years had significantly lower odds of receiving PCCC than adults aged 25 years or older (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.61; 99% CI, 0.37-0.99). There were no differences in receipt of PCCC between young adults aged 20 to 24 years and adults aged 25 years and older (aOR, 0.83; 99% CI, 0.55-1.24). Adolescents who received PCCC had significantly higher odds of using their preferred contraceptive method than adolescents who did not receive PCCC (aOR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.06-5.21). There were no differences in preferred contraceptive method use by PCCC among young adults (aOR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.25-1.26) or adults (aOR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.70-1.45). Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study of self-identified female respondents, we found that adolescents were less likely than adults age 25 years or older to receive PCCC, but adolescents who did receive PCCC reported higher rates of preferred method use. These findings support ongoing efforts to improve the quality of contraceptive counseling for adolescents through person-centered approaches that provide comprehensive information, respect their preferences, and support their autonomy.

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraception BehaviorCounselingFamily Planning ServicesAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41632157
PMCPMC12743274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.