ArticleJAMA network open2025
Liver Metastases and Survival Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-based tumor and organ volumetry predicts early progression after Y-90 radioembolization in liver-dominant metastatic disease.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Topological Quantum Biomaterials Enable Pyroptosis-Senescence Coupling for Enhanced Colorectal Cancer Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Review
- A SEER based SHAP interpretable prognostic nomogram for overall survival in surgically treated patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastasis.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Factors Associated with the Timing of Liver Metastasis After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.Cancers · 2026Article
- Explainable Boosting Machine Predicting Length of Stay After Liver Surgery in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases.Cancers · 2026Article
- Maximizing the "toolbox" for patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases: have liver mets "met" their match?Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- Exploratory analysis of tumor budding density in resected synchronous and metachronous colorectal liver metastases.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Colorectal cancer liver metastasis: immunosuppressive microenvironment, signaling pathways, and emerging therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are a major cause of death in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Understanding patterns of incidence and survival is important to inform clinical care and policy. Objective: To examine temporal patterns of incidence, characteristics, and survival among patients with synchronous and metachronous CRLM. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study in Denmark used Danish national health registries, including the Cancer Registry, National Patient Registry, and National Pathology Registry, as data sources. A nested medical record review of a subset of patients (n = 954) was also conducted to assess concordance in incidence between registry data and medical records. All patients diagnosed with CRLM in Denmark between 2007 and 2024 were included. Main Outcomes and Measures: The end points were the cumulative incidence of CRLM from the date of CRC diagnosis (calculated at 1, 3, and 5 years of follow-up) and overall survival from the date of CRLM diagnosis (estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression models). Hazard ratios with 95% CIs were used to compare survival across diagnosis periods and CRLM subtypes (synchronous, early metachronous, and late metachronous). Results: A total of 14 785 patients with CRLM (median [IQR] age, 68.9 [62.2-77.0] years; 8616 males [58.3%]) were identified. The 5-year cumulative incidence of CRLM in patients with CRC was 19.8% (95% CI, 19.5%-20.1%). The cumulative incidence of CRLM decreased with age but was highest in patients younger than 50 years (5-year follow-up: 27.2%; 95% CI, 25.6%-28.8%); it was also highest in male patients (5-year follow-up: 21.5%; 95% CI, 21.1%-22.0%). The medical record review showed 26.2% (250 of 954) of patients developed CRLM during the follow-up period. One-year survival increased for patients with synchronous CRLM from 47.2% (95% CI, 45.3%-49.1%) in the 2007-2010 diagnosis period to 58.3% (95% CI, 54.1%-62.3%) in the 2020-2024 diagnosis period. Five-year survival also improved for patients with synchronous CRLM from 13.0% (95% CI, 11.7%-14.3%) in the 2007-2010 period to 20.7% (95% CI, 18.1%-23.5%) in the 2020-2024 period. No improvement was observed for either early or late metachronous CRLM. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, over time the cumulative incidence of CRLM decreased across all age groups, while survival increased for patients with synchronous and early metachronous CRLM but not for patients with late metachronous disease. These findings may reflect differences in tumor biology, comorbidity burden, and treatment eligibility and may support targeted follow-up and treatment strategies based on the timing of metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.