Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41632119›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Virtual Care Provision and Emergency Department Use Among Children and Youth.

Gabrielle Freire, Eyal Cohen, Therese A Stukel, Isobel Sharpe, Xuesong Wang, Daniel Rosenfield, Azmina Altaf, Astrid Guttmann, Monica Kopec, Natasha R Saunders

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gabrielle FreireThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Eyal CohenThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Therese A StukelICES, Toronto, Canada.
Isobel SharpeICES, Toronto, Canada.
Xuesong WangICES, Toronto, Canada.
Daniel RosenfieldThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Azmina AltafICES, Toronto, Canada.
Astrid GuttmannThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Monica KopecChild Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.
Natasha R SaundersThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Use of virtual care has rapidly expanded, but its impacts in pediatric emergency department use remain unclear. Objective: To assess whether modality of primary care visits (in-person visit or virtual visit) is associated with subsequent emergency department (ED) use in acutely ill children. Design, Setting, and Participants: Population-based cohort study using routinely collected administrative data of children and youth (age 0-17 years) in Ontario, Canada. Participants were children who had a primary care sick visit between September 2020 and March 2024. One visit per child was randomly selected during the study period and children were categorized by age group (aged <3 months, 3 months to <2 years, and 2-17 years). Exposures: Primary care sick visit modality identified from physician billing codes. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was an ED visit within 3 days of the primary care visit. Secondary outcomes included (1) ED visits leading to hospitalization or death, (2) high-acuity ED visits, and (3) low-acuity ED visits. Age-stratified multivariable logistic generalized estimating equation models were used to estimate the association between modality of the primary care visit and each outcome, clustering patients within physicians and adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical, and health system factors. Results: Participants included 2 608 503 unique children with a sick visit (132 352 [5.1%] aged <3 months; 282 720 [10.8%] aged 3 months to <2 years; 2 608 503 [84.1%] aged 2-17 years). Virtual visits comprised 719 119 (27.6%) of sick visits. Children aged 3 months to less than 2 years had an increased adjusted risk of a subsequent ED visit when seen virtually compared with in person (4.4% vs 3.5%; adjusted risk ratio [ARR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.41-1.57) as did children aged 2 to 17 years (2.2% vs 2.4%; ARR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.15-1.24). Children aged 3 months to less than 2 years and aged 2 to 17 years seen virtually had a lower risk of ED visits leading to hospitalization or death, similar risk of high-acuity ED visit, and higher risk of low-acuity ED visits. Children aged less than 3 months seen virtually had a similar risk of subsequent ED visits to those seen in person. Conclusions and Relevance: In this population-based cohort study of Ontario children and youth, while emergency department visits following a primary sick visit were infrequent, virtual sick visits to primary care were associated with a small increase in emergency department use in children aged 3 months or older, especially low-acuity emergency department visits. Judicious use of virtual primary care to manage acute illness in children is warranted.

Indexed as

Emergency Room VisitsEmergency Service, HospitalPrimary Health CareTelemedicineAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleOntario

Identifiers

PMID41632119
PMCPMC12715653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.