ArticleArchives of microbiology2026
Evaluation of clinically approved neuroprotective drugs as adjunct therapies in experimental cerebral malaria.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cerebral malaria (CM) remains one of the most severe complications of Plasmodium falciparum infection, often leading to death within days and leaving survivors with lasting cognitive damage. Since current treatments target the parasite but offer little to no neuroprotection, we explored whether existing neuroprotective drugs could help fill this gap. Six clinically-approved drugs, viz. topiramate, rasagiline, vinpocetine, cilostazol, piracetam, and rivastigmine were tested for both antimalarial and anti-cerebral malaria activity. Screening against P. falciparum in vitro showed that vinpocetine, cilostazol, and rivastigmine effectively inhibited parasite growth, without causing toxicity in Vero or BB19 cell lines or in human red blood cells. In a mouse model of experimental CM (Plasmodium berghei ANKA-infected C57BL/6 mice), early oral treatment with cilostazol, piracetam, or rivastigmine delayed the onset of CM symptoms and significantly improved survival compared to untreated controls. When treatment was initiated after the first neurological signs, only the combination of rivastigmine with the fast-acting antimalarial α/β-arteether markedly improved outcomes, including parasite clearance and extended survival, compared to either treatment alone. Overall, these results suggest that combining rivastigmine with α/β-arteether may represent a practical and low-cost adjunct therapy for CM. Further mechanistic and clinical studies will be essential to confirm these findings and assess long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41632117What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.