ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2026
Antibiotic resistance gradient along a large Scandinavian river influenced by wastewater treatment plants.
Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Editorial: thematic issue on microbial ecotoxicology of contaminants of emerging concern.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2026Article
- Occurrence ofMicroorganisms · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent studies have identified the environment as a key reservoir from which antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) can be acquired and transmitted to pathogens. However, our knowledge about the presence of ARGs in high-flow river sediments is still limited. We analyzed the resistome of sediment bacterial communities along the Swedish river Göta Älv and investigated the potential dissemination of ARGs and antimicrobials from effluents of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). While we detected nine different antimicrobials in the effluent water from the WWTPs through HPLC-MS, their presence was not observed in the river surface water. Analysis by qPCR revealed that the genes sul1 and ermB were the most dominant ARGs among sediment, sludge, and effluent samples. Shotgun metagenomics revealed unique differences between the sludge resistomes of the WWTPs. Moreover, our findings show that ARGs increase downstream of the Göta Älv and their diversity differs from that of the upstream sites. Efflux pump resistance-related genes were most abundant in sediment samples, and beta-lactams and tetracyclines were the most common antibiotic classes targeted by ARGs. Our study emphasizes the importance of urban river sediments as a reservoir of ARGs, as tracking ARGs in WWTPs and their receiving environments improves our understanding of their spread and characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.