ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2026
Towards Personalised Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Structural Integrity.
Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 4D CT angiography and computational biomechanics dataset for structural integrity assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.Data in brief · 2026Article
- Towards Personalised Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Structural Integrity.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a life-threatening condition characterized by the progressive dilation of the aorta, which can lead to rupture if undetected or untreated. Stress-based rupture risk estimation using computational biomechanics has been widely studied; however, it requires wall strength data that cannot be measured in humans in vivo. To overcome this limitation, the goal of this study is to present a new method for biomechanical assessment of AAA via simultaneous consideration of tension and strain in AAA wall. We present a patient-specific, non-invasive method for assessing the structural integrity of the AAA wall using only time-resolved 3D computed tomography angiography (4D-CTA) images and blood pressure data. The proposed approach integrates wall strain (throughout the cardiac cycle) and wall tension analysis to compute a novel index, the Relative Structural Integrity Index (RSII), which quantifies local wall stiffness independently of wall thickness, wall material properties, and blood pressure measurement conditions. We applied our method to 20 patients from three different hospitals to extract visual RSII maps over the AAA wall of each individual patient and to compare the RSII values between aneurysmal and non-aneurysmal aortas in one patient. Our results primarily show similar RSII values across all patients, indicating the consistency of the method. Additionally, we observed patterns consistent with experimental findings reported in the literature: AAA walls exhibited higher stiffness than healthy aortic walls, while localized low-stiffness zones in the AAA wall were predominantly found in the most dilated regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.