ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2026
Speech Error Subtypes and Their Association With Phonological Awareness in School-Aged Children and Young Adults.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between perceptual clinical speech features and phonological awareness (PA) skills in school-aged children and young adults with persistent speech sound disorder (SSD).
methodThis study retrospectively analyzed data from 103 individuals aged 7-24 years with persistent SSDs. Speech samples were narrowly transcribed and used to calculate the presence of several clinical speech features. Participants' scores for each speech feature were converted to
resultsThe exploratory factor analysis supported a two-factor model: Factor 1 (motor speech-related errors) and Factor 2 (phonological errors). When controlling for age, phonological errors significantly predicted PA skills, while motor speech-related errors and distortions did not uniquely contribute to the variance in PA. The model capturing motor speech errors and phonological errors explained 37.7% of the variance in PA.
conclusionsPersistent phonological errors are strong predictors of PA, highlighting their continued impact on literacy-related skills in school-aged children and young adults with SSD. These results reinforce the importance of addressing phonological errors in clinical assessments and interventions in this population. Further research is needed to explore other factors that contribute to PA and literacy outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.