ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2026
Exploring Sex Differences in Stroke Outcomes: A Comprehensive Analysis From the SPAN 1 Trial.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStroke is a sexually dimorphic disease, with different risk factors, incidence, outcomes, and treatment responses in men and women. While sex differences have been documented in preclinical studies, these findings often come from single-site studies with small sample sizes and require validation across diverse research settings.
methodsWe used data from the SPAN (Stroke Preclinical Assessment Network), a randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded, multilaboratory trial, to determine if sex differences in neurological outcomes are present in preclinical stroke models. We analyzed data from 665 stroke animals treated with saline, including young mice, diet-induced obese mice, aging mice, young rats, and spontaneously hypertensive rats. We compared the corner test index and brain morphology between the sexes using linear random effect models and assessed the mortality rate using Cox proportional hazard regression models.
resultsNo significant sex differences were found in neurological outcome measured with the corner test on either day 7 or day 30 after stroke, regardless of the mouse or rat stroke model used. Additionally, female and male mice exhibited similar infarct sizes on day 2 magnetic resonance imaging and on brain atrophy measures on day 30 after stroke, indicating a lack of sex differences in brain injury. Similarly, no sex differences were observed in acute or chronic sensorimotor or tissue outcomes in young rats. In 1 subanalysis, sex differences were seen in the spontaneously hypertensive rats cohort. Female rats exhibited a higher corner test index on day 30 than males, indicating more severe sensorimotor injury.
conclusionsIn this multicenter preclinical study, we did not detect sex differences in stroke outcomes in mice, although sex differences in behavioral outcomes were observed in spontaneously hypertensive rats. These findings highlight that sex differences may be model-specific and subtle, emphasizing the need for methodological consistency and thoughtful inclusion of diverse animal models in translational stroke research to better understand if sex-specific responses contribute to stroke outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.