Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41631738›Full record

ArticleEar and hearing

Improved Singing Accuracy in Children With Bilateral Hearing Devices With More Musical Activities and Better Verbal Fluency.

Ritva Torppa, Li Xu, Lotta Keitilä, Laura Huhtinen-Hildén, Valerie Looi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ritva TorppaCognitive Brain Research Unit (CBRU), Faculty of Medicine, Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Li XuHearing, Speech and Language Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, USA.
Lotta KeitiläCognitive Brain Research Unit (CBRU), Faculty of Medicine, Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Laura Huhtinen-HildénHelsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, Finland.
Valerie LooiSpiral Therapeutics, San Francisco, California, USA.

Funding

Leo, Mary and Mary-Ann Hackman Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe singing pitch accuracy of children with hearing loss (HL) is typically poor, which may discourage them from singing. Improving this skill is important because it can further impact their cognitive and language development and overall well-being. In children with normal hearing (NH), improving singing pitch accuracy is associated with more musical activities and better language skills. We hypothesized that the singing pitch accuracy of children with HL (1) would be poorer than that of children with NH, (2) would improve more during the music intervention period than during the period without music intervention, (3) would be higher in children who participate in more informal musical activities and (4) would be higher in children who have better semantic verbal fluency performance.

designThe participants were 18 children with HL (age range: 3 to 6 years 10 months; 7 with bilateral cochlear implants, 7 with bilateral hearing aids, 4 with bimodal devices) and 20 children with NH (age range: 2 years 10 months to 6 years 10 months). Children with HL participated in remote or in-person music intervention for 10 weeks. A crossover study design was used, with waiting periods before and after the intervention. Three rounds of measurements were made for each child with HL, before and after each period (at T1, T2, and T3). Children with NH did not participate in the music intervention, and their singing pitch accuracy was measured at a single time point. Children sang the song "Twinkle Twinkle Little Star." A measure of mean note deviation assessed the accuracy of each individually sung note, while a measure of mean interval deviation assessed the accuracy of the relative pitch between two consecutively sung notes (e.g., C4 - F4 = 4th), both averaged across the sung sequence. The average of the "mean note" and "mean interval deviation" was used as a dependent variable in a Linear Mixed Model (LMM). For the semantic verbal fluency task, children listed as many animals as they could in one minute, and the number of correct animal words was calculated. Informal music participation was calculated from a parent-completed questionnaire. The mean of the frequency of these activities/number of correct animal words across T1, T2, and T3 was used in LMM.

resultsThe singing pitch accuracy of the children with bilateral HL group at baseline (T1) was similar to that of children with NH, and there were no significant effects of intervention versus waiting period on mean note/interval deviation. The LMM showed that (i) the more children with HL participated in informal music activities, the better their singing pitch accuracy (main effect, p = 0.009), and (ii) the better they were at the semantic verbal fluency task, the better their singing pitch accuracy (main effect, p = 0.014).

conclusionsAlthough a 10-week music intervention did not improve singing pitch accuracy in this study of children with HL, these novel results showed that participation in informal music activities, along with language skills, is an important contributing factor to how accurately children with HL can sing in tune.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsHearing AidsHearing Loss, BilateralMusicMusic TherapyPitch PerceptionSingingVerbal BehaviorChildChild, PreschoolCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMaleChildrenCochlear implantHearing aidHearing lossInformal musical activitiesMusic interventionSemantic verbal fluencySinging pitch accuracy

Identifiers

PMID41631738
PMCPMC13252975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.