Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41631640›Full record

ArticleHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2026

The impact and cost-effectiveness of scaling up HCV treatment for achieving elimination among people who inject drugs in England: a synopsis including evidence synthesis and economic modelling.

Zoe Ward, Ruth Simmons, Hannah Fraser, Adam Trickey, Joanna Kesten, Andrew Gibson, Leila Reid, Sean Cox, Fiona Gordon, Stuart McPherson and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Zoe WardPopulation Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0268-988X
Ruth SimmonsUK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8156-0146
Hannah FraserPopulation Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4340-9995
Adam TrickeyPopulation Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3462-2898
Joanna KestenPopulation Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3674-6045
Andrew GibsonUniversity of West of England, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9524-984X
Leila ReidThe Hepatitis C Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3727-6708
Sean CoxThe Hepatitis C Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0007-6763-8091
Fiona GordonUniversity Hospitals Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0009-0009-6026-4351
Stuart McPhersonNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5638-2453
Stephen RyderNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9649-4444
Francisco Javier VilarManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-0957-1018
Alec MinersLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0005-2510-9007
Jack WilliamsLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1331-387X
Beatrice EmmanouilNHS England, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1223-5571
Monica DesaiUK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8632-9808
Laura CoughlanUK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0300-4950
Ross HarrisUK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3190-7281
Graham R FosterNHS England, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3704-386X
Matthew HickmanPopulation Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9864-459X
Sema MandalUK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3379-3118
Peter VickermanPopulation Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8291-5890

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: People who inject drugs are disproportionately affected by hepatitis C virus. The emergence of direct-acting antiviral treatments for hepatitis C virus motivated England to achieve the World Health Organization's elimination target of decreasing hepatitis C virus incidence among people who inject drugs to < 2 per 100 person-years (/100 person-years) by 2030. We determined whether existing testing and treatment strategies will reach this target in England, or whether improved strategies are needed and whether they are cost-effective. Methods: A dynamic hepatitis C virus transmission model among people who inject drugs was developed for four English regions. The model included the pathway from testing to treatment in prisons, drug treatment centres and other settings. Each pathway was parameterised using region-specific data, with yearly bio-behavioural surveys among people who inject drugs being used to parameterise and calibrate the model in a Bayesian framework. The model projected whether each region will reach the hepatitis C virus incidence target or what improvements (in testing and linkage to treatment) are needed from 2024 to achieve it. Hepatitis C virus care pathway costs were collated through interviews with practitioners and the published literature. The mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (per quality-adjusted life-year saved) was estimated for any 'improved' strategy that reached the incidence target compared to the baseline strategy. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were compared to a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000/quality-adjusted life-year saved over a 50-year time horizon (3.5% annual discount rate). Results: Across the four regions over 2016-22, an estimated 8831-9689 treatments occurred among 37,230 people who inject drugs, with the annual number treated increasing in prisons (7.8 times) and drug treatment centres (3.6 times). Model projections suggest that hepatitis C virus incidence among people who inject drugs has decreased across the regions by 56.1-85.4% (range of medians) over 2015-22, with incidence decreasing by 79.7-98.6% to 0.2-2.2/100 person-years by 2030. The World Health Organization incidence target (< 2/100 person-years) will be reached with > 80% probability in three regions and 40% probability in the other region. The probability of reaching the incidence target increases to > 65% in this region if screening is increased in drug treatment centres (80% screened annually) or prisons (75% of people get tested during their prison stay), with these screening strategies being cost-effective. Conclusion: Numerous England regions may be on target to decrease hepatitis C virus incidence among people who inject drugs to < 2/100 person-years. In regions that are not on target, further scale-up of testing in drug treatment centre or prison from 2024 could enable them to reach the World Health Organization elimination target and be cost-effective. Limitations: Projections were based on model estimations, which need to be confirmed with empirical data. Data uncertainties affected our model projections, including uncertainty in the number of people who inject drugs in each region and the number of treatments given to people who inject drugs in different settings. Sample sizes for the yearly bio-behavioural surveys among people who inject drugs were small, and so samples were pooled over multiple years. Testing rates among people who inject drugs could not be directly estimated because the sentinel surveillance had incomplete coverage and could not identify people who inject drugs; testing rates were estimated through model calibration. Future work: There is interest in understanding what scale-back in testing can occur after 2030 without resulting in a rebound in hepatitis C virus incidence, and in developing models for each devolved nation to determine their progress to World Health Organization hepatitis C virus elimination targets. Funding: This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number NIHR128513.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsHepatitis CSubstance Abuse, IntravenousBayes TheoremCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisEnglandHumansIncidenceModels, EconomicQuality-Adjusted Life YearsAntiviral AgentsANTIVIRAL AGENTSBAYES THEOREMCALIBRATIONCHRONICCOST–BENEFIT ANALYSISCOST-EFFECTIVENESSCRITICAL PATHWAYSDIRECT ACTING ANTIVIRAL TREATMENTDRUG USERSELIMINATIONENGLANDGOALSHEALTHCARE COSTSHEPACIVIRUSHEPATITIS CHOSPITALSINCIDENCEINTRAVENOUSLABORATORIESMODELLINGPEOPLE WHO INJECT DRUGSPREVALENCEPRISONSPUBLIC HEALTHQUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE-YEARSQUALITY OF LIFESAMPLE SIZESEMANTIC WEBSENTINEL SURVEILLANCESTATE MEDICINESUBSTANCE ABUSESUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTRESTIME-TO-TREATMENTUKUNCERTAINTYUNITED KINGDOMWORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

Identifiers

PMID41631640
PMCPMC12884358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.