SynthesisEuropean journal of oral sciences2026
Use of the oral microbiota as screening test to identify children at risk for caries development. A systematic review of longitudinal studies.
Synthesis in European journal of oral sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Who Gets Dental Caries? A Comprehensive Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated trends in oral microbiota composition (index test) that could indicate potential candidates to identify children at risk for dental caries development compared with visual/tactile examination (reference test). MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, Lilacs, SciELO, and Google Scholar databases were searched up to September 2025. Methodological quality was assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and QUADAS-2. Qualitative synthesis was performed using all included studies. Thirteen studies that assessed the oral microbiota composition through high-throughput sequencing platforms were included comprising 740 caries-free participants at the baseline. Alloprevotella spp. and Megasphaera spp. were exclusively highly abundant in children who developed caries, whereas Peptostreptococcus spp. was exclusively highly abundant in caries-free children. The diagnostic value of the oral microbiota composition showed specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve ranging from 0.6 to 1.0, 0.75 to 0.90, 0.73 to 0.93, and from 0.51 to 0.94, respectively. High risk of bias was found for the index test. The available evidence does not support the use of oral microbiota composition as a screening test to identify children at risk for caries development. Studies conducted at the species level are likely to provide results with greater sensitivity and specificity, improving risk assessment and understanding of caries-associated microbiota (PROSPERO CRD42023495648).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.