ReviewEuropean journal of haematology2026
Frontline Therapy in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Evolving Standards, Biological Insights, and Future Directions.
Review in European journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictors and Risk Assessment Models for Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Diagnosed with Lymphoma: A Systematic Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Pooled it
- Minimal residual disease in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after first-line therapy: Defining the continuum from metabolic remission to molecular clearance.British journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Primary hepatopancreatobiliary lymphoma: epidemiology, clinical features, and treatment outcomes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Overcoming chemotherapy resistance in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma using multifunctional nanocarriers: current advances and clinical challenges.Discover nano · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains the most common aggressive lymphoma, representing a biologically heterogeneous disease with diverse clinical behaviors. For more than two decades, R-CHOP has been the cornerstone of frontline treatment, curing approximately two-thirds of patients. Despite this success, a substantial subset-particularly those with high-risk biology, double-hit genetics, activated B-cell-like (ABC) subtype, or adverse clinical features-still experience relapse or refractory disease. Recent advances in lymphoma biology, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy have stimulated intense interest in improving frontline outcomes. Strategies include optimizing cytotoxic backbone regimens, incorporating antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), bispecific antibodies, and exploring the feasibility of frontline CAR-T cell therapy. This review provides a comprehensive and discursive synthesis of the biological rationale, clinical evidence, trial results, and practical considerations shaping contemporary frontline treatment. We highlight the emerging role of molecular subtyping, the tumor microenvironment, and high-risk biomarkers, while discussing ongoing challenges and opportunities in integrating novel modalities into standard practice. Although R-CHOP remains the universal backbone, the therapeutic landscape is entering a transformative era, with polatuzumab-based regimens, bispecific combinations, and precision-guided approaches positioned to redefine frontline care for selected subgroups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.