ArticleJournal of anatomy2026
Spatiotemporal remodelling of the cloacal region determines the position of the anal opening in mouse embryos.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional embryological models propose that the urorectal septum (URS) fuses with the cloacal membrane (CM) to form separate exits for the hindgut and urogenital sinus (UGS). However, previous studies have been re-evaluating this assumption, and the precise morphogenetic mechanisms determining the position of the anal opening remain unclear. To elucidate the spatial and temporal dynamics of cloacal development, we analysed mouse embryos from embryonic day (E)11.5 to E13.5 using serial midsagittal histological sections combined with three-dimensional reconstruction. We focused on the positional relationship between the URS and CM, as well as the internal remodelling events of the cloaca that lead to anal opening formation. Throughout development, the URS enlarged and shifted distally, but consistently remained dorsodistal to the CM without direct fusion. At E13.0, we identified an expanded space at the caudal end of the hindgut, distinct from the hindgut lumen. By E13.25, this space connected to the UGS via a duct-like structure, contributing to the separation of the UGS and hindgut. By E13.5, the CM ruptured and the anal opening emerged precisely at the junction between the hindgut lumen and the expanded space. Our findings demonstrate that the position of the anal opening is predetermined by cloacal internal space remodelling rather than fusion of the URS and CM. This study offers novel insights into normal anorectal development and the aetiology of congenital anorectal malformations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.