ArticleWorld journal of surgery2026
Expanding Access to Orthopedic Trauma Care: Evaluation of a Task-Sharing Model With a Remote Quality Assessment Tool for Open Tibia Shaft Fractures in Malawi.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTimely care for open tibia fractures remains difficult in low-resource settings. We evaluated a task-sharing model in Malawi in which trained orthopedic clinical officers (OCOs) delivered external fixation supported by a remote quality assessment tool.
methodsWe conducted a prospective implementation evaluation across one central and four district hospitals (May 2023-July 2024). The intervention bundled OR refurbishment assured external fixator supply, refresher training, mentoring (on-site and remote), national guideline reinforcement, and a novel Fracture Fixation Assessment Tool for External Fixation (FFATEF). OCOs submitted postoperative radiographs and construct photographs for scoring across four domains (reduction, stability, implantation, and surgical impression; total 0-12 and satisfactory ≥ 8). Nonparametric tests compared performance by the hospital type; temporal trends were assessed with Spearman correlation.
resultsForty-seven patients (89% male and mean age 32.3 years) were treated (central: n = 28 and district: n = 19). The central hospital managed more severe injuries (Gustilo IIIA/B 69.6% vs. 15.8%). Median FFATEF scores were higher at the central hospital (10.0 [IQR 9-11]) than district hospitals (6.0 [5, 6, 7, 8], p < 0.001). Satisfactory scores (≥ 8) occurred in 93% of central versus 32% of district cases. Central scores improved over time (ρ = 0.52; p = 0.005) whereas district scores were unchanged (ρ = 0.15; p = 0.540). Preoperative antibiotic compliance was 100% at the central versus 47% at district hospitals.
conclusionsWhen embedded within integrated surgical teams and adequate infrastructure, task sharing for open fracture external fixation yielded satisfactory technical performance but lagged district-level implementation despite training. Comprehensive institutional support-mentoring intensity, equipment, supply chains, and referral adherence-is likely required for safe scale-up. Validation of FFATEF against clinical outcomes and economic evaluation of delivery models are priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.