ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2025
Reproductive coercion experienced by women living with HIV - a global scoping review.
Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomedical advancements in HIV prevention and treatment have provided opportunities for women living with HIV to move through pregnancy, give birth, and breastfeed while effectively removing the risk of vertical transmission of HIV to their child. However, existing evidence suggests that the reproductive health and rights of women living with HIV are threatened through coercive practices in healthcare settings because of their HIV status. The objective of this scoping review was to synthesise evidence and identify gaps in the literature on reproductive coercion experienced by women living with HIV in clinical settings. This review focused specifically on reproductive coercion in the context of clinical healthcare globally, as opposed to intimate partnerships, and included forced or covertly performed sterilisation, forced abortion, restricted or forced contraceptive methods, forced or denied caesarean sections, and general coercion by healthcare providers regarding fertility-, sexual-, and reproductive-related decision-making. We searched three databases (Embase, PubMed, and LILACS) for quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies. After 2888 unique publications were screened, thirteen publications met the inclusion criteria. Sterilisation was the most common coercion type assessed, and Mexico, the United States, and South Africa were common study settings. Variation in reproductive coercion definitions, study methods, and reporting was observed. Evidence from these studies suggests that reproductive coercion among women living with HIV is severe and pervasive. Therefore, there is a need to expand research on coercion and stigma that women living with HIV face while navigating reproductive healthcare. Additionally, prevention mechanisms and resource expansion for survivors beyond legal settings should be implemented globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.