ArticleData in brief2026
A dataset of acoustics emissions recordings of woodboring insects in wood and cultural objects, context images and remarks.
Article in Data in brief, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This dataset presents acoustic emission (AE) recordings collected from woodboring insect-infested and non-infested wood samples and cultural heritage objects. Data acquisition was conducted across four institutions: Haute École Arc (HE-Arc), Switzerland; Canadian Museum of History (CMH), Canada; National Gallery of Canada (NGC), Canada; and Musée National de l'Automobile (MNA), France; from April to July 2025. The recordings were captured using Vallen VS900-M sensors with AEP5 preamplifiers set to 34dB gain and AMSY-6 4-channel chassis, employing continuous acoustic emission monitoring at 2 MHz sampling rate. Each experiment utilized three sensors positioned on test objects and one reference sensor facing up to record ambient noise conditions. The dataset comprises approximately 440.9 hours of recordings distributed across the four collection sites. The dataset includes four main components: raw Vallen AE database files (.tradb format), processed statistical data exported as CSV files, contextual images documenting setups and sensor placements, and Python script for statistical data processing. Each experiment is documented with duration, material specifications, coupling methods (renaissance wax, cyclododecane, or mechanical fastening), environmental conditions, and infestation labels. The dataset's structure enables multiple research applications. The time-series statistical features and binary classification labels (infested/non-infested) provide a foundation for supervised machine learning model development. The diverse experimental conditions across four geographic locations, varying coupling methods, and different ambient environments offer opportunities to evaluate model generalization and robustness. Reference sensor recordings captured simultaneously with each experiment allow for ambient noise characterization studies and development of noise filtering methodologies. The combination of raw acoustic data and contextual documentation makes this dataset suitable for comparative studies of different signal processing approaches and feature extraction techniques in acoustic emission analysis for heritage conservation applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.