ArticleTherapeutic advances in ophthalmology
A cohort study of exodrift following the recession-plication technique for the treatment of basic type intermittent exotropia in children.
Article in Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intermittent exotropia (IXT) is a prevalent strabismus in Asian children. While surgery is the main treatment, its long-term success can be influenced by postoperative exodrift. Therefore, accurately assessing this exodrift is essential to determine the optimal early postoperative alignment. Objectives: To investigate postoperative exodrift changes following unilateral lateral rectus recession combined with medial rectus plication (RP) procedure for children with basic type intermittent exotropia (IXT). Design: Retrospective, Cohort study. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on the clinical data of patients with basic type IXT who underwent surgical intervention between 2022 and 2023, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Based on the postoperative ocular alignment at near within the first week, patients were divided into three groups: Group exo with exodeviation equal or exceeding 5 prism diopter (PD); Group ortho with exodeviation or esodeviation less than 5 PD; and Group eso with esodeviation equal or exceeding 5 PD. The successful motor outcome was defined as exodeviation or esodeviation equal to or less than 10 PD. The recurrent exotropia was defined as exodeviation exceeding 10 PD, and consecutive esotropia was defined as esodeviation exceeding 10 PD. The clinical features associated with motor outcomes and sensory outcomes were analyzed. Results: Final exodrift magnitudes were comparable across groups: Group exo (distance: 10.18 ± 10.55 PD, near:7.71 ± 9.82 PD), Group ortho (distance: 8.27 ± 7.23 PD, near: 9.13 ± 8.13 PD), Group eso (distance: 12.50 ± 10.71 PD, near: 12.80 ± 11.69 PD), ( Conclusion: Children with basic type IXT who exhibit varying ocular alignment in the early postoperative period demonstrated a comparable magnitude of 10 PD for long-term exodrift. It is recommended to overcorrect within the range of 0 to 10 PD following RP techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.