Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41631238›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026

Pressure ulcer practice in European hospitals: a scoping review.

Jan Kottner, Ulrike Linstedt, Ahmed Tafesh, Monira El Genedy-Kalyoncu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jan KottnerCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany.
Ulrike LinstedtCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany.
Ahmed TafeshCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany.
Monira El Genedy-KalyoncuCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pressure ulcer prevention and management belong to the core topics of nursing practice and research for decades. Numerous systematic reviews, clinical practice guidelines, and good practice documents are available, but pressure ulcer prevention and treatment may not be conducted following state-of-the-art methods in clinical practice. Objectives: The overall objective was to describe and map the available evidence regarding pressure ulcer prevention and treatment practices in European hospitals. Methods: A scoping review was conducted in the databases Embase and Medline (via OVID) and CINAHL including descriptive empirical studies published between 2014 and 2024. The population included all healthcare professionals, and context was hospitals in the European Union. Results: Forty-six studies from 18 countries were included, describing 33 structure and 32 process aspects. The categories knowledge ( Conclusion: More than 60 organizational, structural, and process characteristics were identified as potentially influencing pressure ulcer practice in European hospitals. Individual knowledge and attitudes and the availability of standards/protocols were most often investigated indicating a perceived priority in shaping pressure ulcer practice. Since all studies indicate knowledge deficits and a lack of implementation of basic prophylactic measures, there seems to be high potential to improve pressure ulcer prevention and enhance patient safety.

Indexed as

HospitalPressure ulcerPreventionTreatment

Identifiers

PMID41631238
PMCPMC12861148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.