ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Performance prediction equation for the Valencia Marathon based on time and pacing in the half marathon.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pacing Profiles in Half-Marathon and Marathon Running Based on Performance Level, Sex, and Age: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Although pacing is a variable that affects marathon running performance, there is a lack of studies that assessed whether it can improve performance prediction. The aim was to calculate a linear regression model with data such as the half marathon race time, age category, sex and pacing range (difference between the maximum and minimum relative speed of the half marathon) to predict the marathon time. Moreover, the accuracy of the prediction equation obtained was compared with the Daniels' VDOT. Methods: A total of 8.261 runners, who participated in both events (Valencia Half Marathon and Marathon) in the same year, for the 2022 and 2023 editions, and ran the half marathon faster than the marathon, were included in the study. Three linear regression models were obtained: a first model with only the half marathon time and sex, a second model adding the age category to these, and a final model adding the pace range to the previous ones. Afterwards, the most accurate and simple model was selected, and its fitting was compared with respect to a model contrasted by the literature, the VDOT. Results: The introduction of the pace range variable did not improve the model's prediction, obtaining an explained variance of 85% and an mean absolute error of 5.9%. The overall accuracy of the model obtained was similar to that of the VDOT system, but the models behaved differently depending on the level of runners' performance. Discussion: These results allow coaches and runners to establish specific training rhythms to work on the competition pacing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.