ReviewCureus2025
Assessing the Role of Intrathecal Catheters in Preventing Post-dural Puncture Headaches: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- SGLT2i, anti-endothelin A and double endothelin and angiotensin inhibitors: a new future for chronic kidney disease in children.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- Continuous Spinal Anesthesia in Frail Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Hip and Knee Revision Surgery: Advantages, Indications, and Risk Management-A Single-Center Retrospective Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Efficacy of nebulised dexmedetomidine versus aminophylline for treatment of postdural puncture headache in patients undergoing subarachnoid block posted for caesarean section: a double-blind, randomised controlled study.BMJ neurology open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is defined as a postural headache that frequently develops within five to seven days following dural puncture, typically due to persistent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. Young individuals and the obstetric population are particularly affected, and if not managed timely and appropriately, PDPH can lead to serious repercussions. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy of intrathecal catheter placement in reducing the incidence of PDPH following accidental dural puncture (ADP). Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive search across multiple databases identified 11 relevant studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, case series, and case reports, with sample sizes ranging from one to 1001. Inclusion criteria focused on adults (≥18 years) who experienced ADP, comparing those receiving intrathecal catheter placement to those who did not. Quality assessment tools were employed to evaluate the methodological rigor of the included studies. The synthesized evidence suggests that intrathecal catheter placement may be associated with lower rates of PDPH compared to standard management in many studies, and it appears to have a favorable safety profile. However, significant heterogeneity in study designs, populations, and outcome definitions precludes a definitive conclusion. Intrathecal catheter placement appears to be a promising intervention for managing ADP, potentially reducing PDPH incidence. Given the variability in evidence, further rigorous research, particularly large-scale RCTs, is required to confirm efficacy and establish standardized protocols for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.