Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41631221›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Assessing the Role of Intrathecal Catheters in Preventing Post-dural Puncture Headaches: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence.

Isha Chopra, Abdullah Kilic, Ayushi Saxena, Bilal Khan, Rupanshu Rupanshu, Russaal S Mann, Iana A Malasevskaia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Isha ChopraAnesthesia, Government Medical College, Dausa, Mitrapura, IND.
Abdullah KilicInternal Medicine, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, USA.
Ayushi SaxenaMedicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Bilal KhanHealth Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, CAN.
Rupanshu RupanshuInternal Medicine, St. Martinus University Faculty of Medicine, Willemstad, CUW.
Russaal S MannInternal Medicine, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, IND.
Iana A MalasevskaiaHospital-Based Medicine, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is defined as a postural headache that frequently develops within five to seven days following dural puncture, typically due to persistent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. Young individuals and the obstetric population are particularly affected, and if not managed timely and appropriately, PDPH can lead to serious repercussions. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy of intrathecal catheter placement in reducing the incidence of PDPH following accidental dural puncture (ADP). Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive search across multiple databases identified 11 relevant studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, case series, and case reports, with sample sizes ranging from one to 1001. Inclusion criteria focused on adults (≥18 years) who experienced ADP, comparing those receiving intrathecal catheter placement to those who did not. Quality assessment tools were employed to evaluate the methodological rigor of the included studies. The synthesized evidence suggests that intrathecal catheter placement may be associated with lower rates of PDPH compared to standard management in many studies, and it appears to have a favorable safety profile. However, significant heterogeneity in study designs, populations, and outcome definitions precludes a definitive conclusion. Intrathecal catheter placement appears to be a promising intervention for managing ADP, potentially reducing PDPH incidence. Given the variability in evidence, further rigorous research, particularly large-scale RCTs, is required to confirm efficacy and establish standardized protocols for clinical use.

Indexed as

accidental dural punctureepidural blood patchintrathecal cathetersneuraxial complicationspost-dural puncture headachesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41631221
PMCPMC12860578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.