ArticleAdvances in ophthalmology practice and research
The influence of a modified haptic on preventing toric IOL rotation in high rotation risk eyes.
Article in Advances in ophthalmology practice and research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative study on rotational stability of toric intraocular lenses in cataract patients with low astigmatism: vertical versus horizontal implantation.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the rotational stability and astigmatic correction of a C-loop frosted haptic toric intraocular lens (IOL) compared with a plate-haptic toric IOL with/without capsular tension ring (CTR) implantation in cataractous eyes with high rotation risk due to large white-to-white (WTW) distance. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 90 cataractous eyes with WTW > 11.8 mm, which received implantation of either a C-loop frosted haptic toric IOL (Group ZCU), a plate-haptic toric IOL (Group 709), or a plate-haptic toric IOL with CTR (Group 709 + CTR). IOL rotation and residual astigmatism were assessed one month postoperatively. Results: Group ZCU demonstrated significantly better rotational stability, with a mean rotation of 1.87° ± 1.03°, compared to 4.63° ± 2.12° in Group 709 and 4.13° ± 1.86° in Group 709 + CTR (both Conclusions: In eyes with high rotation risk due to large WTW (> 11.8 mm), the ZCU IOL exhibits superior rotational stability and astigmatic correction compared to the 709 IOL, regardless of whether CTR is used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.